Bringing the Defaults to The User #Kynetx

Disclosure: This post is a paid post originally published on Kynetx’s company blog. If you want to learn more, read this post here.

Brought to you by Kynetx: This Changes Everything!

At the Kynetx Impact Conference, respected technology blogger and Microsoft employee, Jon Udell, spoke about the history, current, and hopeful future of the contextual web.

If there was one thing that truly struck me hard about Udell’s speech at Impact, it was the bit about user defaults. Here’s a quote from him that really sums up the topic of defaults quite well:

“People will say that they want to have things their way. They will make it sound like they care a lot about about personalization, but, watch what people do, and they will almost always take the defaults”.

What is great about this statement is how true it really is.

Need proof?

Let’s look at my prom coming up this weekend. We are going to the amusement park at Mall of America and the dance will be held at Underwater World in MOA as well.

Great, right?

Not so much.

Due to liability and other legal issues, if we are going to prom (which I am), we cannot leave the amusement park, which means we will not get home until five in the morning.

Needless to say, most students were not particularly thrilled about this.

But wait! The school did give us the chance to “personalize” our prom. In a letter sent out to all students, the school laid out their budget with a list of restrictions and basically said if we can think of something better within these parameters, we’ll adjust our plans.

Not one student, including myself, went about doing this. Instead, we threw the letters away, and continued to moan and groan about the situation. Why is this? After all, the school gave us all the necessary tools to basically “customize” our prom. We really had no excuse not to take advantage of these tools and options provided to us.

It is because we as a human race are inherently lazy, and that’s not going to change when a browser is opened.

I would almost go as far to say that if it was up to the students to make our prom happen at all, and we had the necessary tools, there would still be no prom.

The school basically had to “opt-in” the student body in order to get the ball rolling. Turns out what they were opting us into wasn’t all that popular with the student body, but was still accepted.

Sound familiar to *cough*, Facebook anyone?

So how do we solve this situation? As Udell rightly pointed out, it is quite a difficult balance to maintain, and no one has a true solution. But there is one company that I truly believe is headed in the right direction, and this company (surprise!) is Kynetx. They are solving this dilemma by enabling developers to bring the defaults to the user.

What do I mean by this?

A quick look back at my prom story should clarify.

If the school would’ve given us a list of defaults, or what students would’ve perceived as options, we would’ve chosen out of all the defaults the one that would’ve suited us best as a student body.

Kynetx is doing the same thing.

Developers are the school of the Kynetx platform, providing applications, or defaults, for users to choose from. Users of these apps are the students of the school, choosing the best application, or default, to create a more personalized/contextual web.

It’s fascinating, isn’t it? The answer has been staring us right in the face this whole time.

With some fine tuning and the integral help of the Kynetx platform, bringing defaults to the user could strike this balance that Facebook, and many other companies, are seemingly struggling to find. I for one believe that this is the simple and efficient balance many people are begging for, do you agree?

Disclosure: This post is a paid post originally published on Kynetx’s company blog. If you want to learn more, read this post here.

Share
Posted in Tech | Tagged , | 1 Comment

I Am Getting Paid To Do This Writing Thing (How Does It Impact You)

I know I have a handful of dedicated readers out there *waves* and I spose’ now is as good time as many to do the thing that for some reason most bloggers dread.

Disclosures.

You see, after nearly three years of blogging at random places (LostTheTech, TechGeist, TheNextWeb, Technorati… whatever), having an assortment of grammar fails, being horrifically wrong on numerous occasions, and getting tore a new one by random commenters on Digg/Reddit/Slashdot/FriendFeed/Twitter or any other social media service you can possibly imagine, it is all finally starting to pay off.

Last week, Sean O’Gwin called me and offered me a freelance job to write about each of the speakers at the Kynetx Impact Conferencespecifically what my personal thoughts were on each of them.

Woah.

I have never actually been straight up paid to write blog posts before. Sure, I have earned some advertising money here or there, but to be honest, the money I earn from Cliqset doesn’t even begin to cover hosting, and let’s not bring up Adsense.

Needless to say, I took the job. Which means I now have an official conflict of interest!

My first post will go out today, and I will be cross-posting the post I wrote for the Kynetx blog to mine with links and probably a little graphic pimping Kynetx as well. There will also be the appropriate disclosure at the beginning and end of the post making it very clear I did get paid to write it. Every word written in that post, and future posts, will be 100% what I think about Kynetx and whatever other parties I mentioned. I have been blogging basically unpaid for a few years now, if I didn’t believe in Kynetx, I wouldn’t of taken the job. While the money is nice (the good lord knows I can do with it), I am not willing to compromise the hopeful trust ,and credibility, I have with you readers. I would gladly deny that paycheck if I had to, and I hope you know that…

Y’all are worth more to me.

So in short, yup, I am getting paid, and in essence, I truly believe it shouldn’t affect you at all.

BUT

If you feel it is, you know where to get a hold of me, private or public, it doesn’t matter.

Until then, I really do hope you enjoy :D

Note: There is a slight possibility that this job with Kynetx could turn into a more permanent position. If it does, I will write a whole new post addressing that issue. Until then, I am not concerned about it, and neither should y’all.

Share
Posted in Personal, Social, Tech | Tagged | 11 Comments

Why Is It So Hard To Move From Gmail to Google Apps?

I have decided that I have invested enough of myself into this domain/blog that I am going to take a leap of faith and transfer my main means of communication from holdenpage@gmail.com to holdenpage@pagesaresocial.com.

I thought this would be a quick and painless process. After all, I am still going to use Google Apps for all of this, transition should be simple, right?

Wrong.

Turns out there is no nice “migrate” or “transfer” button to move your Gmail data (contacts, filters, e-mails, and all that jazz) to your Google Apps account. Instead, you need to go through all of this. So what I thought would take a max of 24 hours, mostly due to my host/Google recognizing MX record changes, the process is going to take about a week. This will also include transferring my Google Documents, Reader settings, and other data to this “new identity”.

You don’t realize how much data Google has under your Gmail identity until you need to move it.

Now, don’t lecture me on how many ways I can get around this. In short, I am anal, and I want all my data under this new identity. I am completely aware of the options I have. Just so happens what I thought was the easy option, and the option I wanted, is a bit harder and more time consuming then I originally believed.

Bummer.

I just find it fascinating that Google hasn’t created a syncing tool for situations like these. After all, it doesn’t seem that uncommon to do, plenty of searches and threads are open on the matter.

It will be an interesting week transferring my data, and I am sure I will tweet all about.

Share
Posted in Personal, Social, Tech | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Why “Google Editions” Is No Threat to Apple or Amazon

Note: Ignore this post, I am wrong and did not think this through. I tried to write counter-arguments but simply couldn’t due to the fact the premise of my post is severely flawed. I will follow up on this post in the future when Google Editions actually releases in order to make a more informed (and more defensible) opinion. In the mean time, check out the comments as to why I am wrong. Good stuff.

Reports are surfacing that Google will start selling digital books this summer through a product called Google Editions. Based on reports, about 300,000+ books will be up for sale, making Amazon’s and Apple’s inventory of e-books look pitiful in comparison. Already bloggers are calling it a “war”.

Look, I am not going to go into some real deep analysis here, so I am going to lay it out bluntly.

Google Editions is going to suck, just like Google Buzz sucks.

Don’t get me wrong, I love Google, but all they are doing is hopping on yet another bandwagon without any passion. Amazon and Apple are dead serious about competing in this space. Hell, they have both released devices basically dedicated to the market. They are willing to spend the time, effort, and commit the necessary amount of failure in order to succeed.

I don’t think Google is.

Therein lies the problem with Google lately. Sure, Google can release a product allowing you to purchase books, and yes, a good number of people will probably use it, but when it comes right down to it, Amazon and Apple will be the winners of this war. They will have the majority of consumer support due to the fact they are focused on releasing what they think is the future of reading.

What I am trying to get at is that without focus and passion, Google will keep releasing new products and see semi-successes. They need to fix this in order to compete. Until then, Amazon and Apple can keep on keepin’ on while swapping away the fly that is Google.

Share
Posted in Social, Tech | Tagged , , , | 12 Comments

Why I Am Not Worried About Facebook Controlling My Web Life

A lot of people are really upset with Facebook. Steven Hodson of Shooting At Bubbles has written numerous posts on the matter, and so have many others.

Quite a few people have asked for my opinion on Facebook’s latest social moves, and I haven’t really given a straight answer to any of them. At first I thought this was because I haven’t had time to think it all through. Turns out (surprise!), I was wrong. It wasn’t that I didn’t have time to think it all through, it was because I simply didn’t care.

As far as I know, Facebook is not doing anything “bad” with my data, and all in all, they are actually making my web experience better. After all, it is nice having all my friend suggestions with Pandora, as Robert Scoble pointed out. Plus, I lead a rather public life anyways, and anything I want private I simply don’t publish, and IMO, more people should follow that line of logic. Still, this isn’t the real reason why I don’t care. The real reason I don’t care is because Facebook is simply the intertubes latest play thing.

Look, I haven’t been on the web for long, but I am not stupid. By tomorrow, someone could make a service that could displace Facebook’s dominance within the next two years. After all, I remember the days when many tech bloggers said that Facebook would never touch Myspace in terms of reaching us teens and displacing them as the number one social network. I also recall them saying it with such a definitive attitude, it was hard not to believe them.

Whoops.

From my perspective, Facebook’s dominance, while powerful and controversial today, will be moot by tomorrow. That isn’t to say that y’all shouldn’t care, someone needs to, or one of these days a company is truly going to cross the line. So I will let my buddy Steven make sure we all keep our eyes and ears open to Facebook’s latest “shinnagins”, while I sit here quietly, watching as some new service takes over the web while us bloggers profess that Facebook will never be beat.

Meanwhile, I will listen to some awesome songs suggested to me by my friends on Pandora, and at the very least, remain entertained.

Share
Posted in Social, Tech | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Why Is It #allaboutholdenpage at Kynetx?

If you followed the Kynetx Impact Conference at all, or you followed my Twitter stream, you know that the conference was “all about me”.

While I would love to think this is because I am oh so incredibly awesome and popular, the reality is, I am not that cool, nor am I that awesome (well… I do think I am pretty awesome at times :P ).The point Steve Fulling, and the rest of the Kynetx team was trying to make with #itsallaboutholdenpage is that with Kynetx’s platform, the web is all about me, and in extension, all about you.

What do I mean?

Let’s first look at it from a web users standpoint. The web, as we typically see it today, is controlled by the vision of huge entities such as Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Amazon, and even Twitter. Mainstream users are *begging* for more personalization. The problem that we have with personalization is that mainstream users don’t typically know how to go about personalizing the web.

Also, the dirty truth about mainstream users is that while they *want* personalization, when companies offer them just that, most users “go for the defaults” (credit: Jon Udell). Hell, even I go for the defaults out of pure laziness, and I talk about personalization on my blog all the time!

In another words, we want a contextual web, but we users simply don’t want to work for it!

So how do we break this barrier?

We have to create a balance between personalization and ease of use. Right now, most personalization tools require quite a bit of manual labor. Spending ten minutes in the world personalizing your experience on one site is the equivalent of driving an hour and a half away to get McDonald’s when you already have one in town, a huge waste of time and effort. It doesn’t help that once you customize your experience on one site, the siloed web we live in today prevents us from transferring that personalization to other sites. Granted, Facebook is doing a good job at solving this problem with OpenGraph, but at the expense of privacy and user trust (supposedly).

The solution to this is to create a platform that allows users to opt-in to the personalization and have the contextual web experience they have always wanted with little to no work. It wasn’t until this week that I truly realized that Kynetx is this platform.

Kynetx allows people such as you and me, to create a contextual web experience. All we users have to do now is click, “install” and bam! Our web is personalized and tailored to our personal needs, while still maintaining complete control. I think that is pretty cool, and I now share Jesse Stay’s view that Kynetx is the future of the web.

But Kynetx is not just about us web users, Kynetx is also about the developers.

Most developers want easy ways to provide a contextual web for mainstream users while respecting their users rights. Developers also want easy ways to create, update, and distribute their apps. Kynetx is completely opt-in for the user. Creating applications using the Kynetx App Builder is a breeze (granted, I only made a hello world app). Want to distribute your application via bookmarklet, extension, or identity card? Kynetx automatically does that for you once you are done creating your application. Want to sell your application? Feel free to in the Kynetx Marketplace.

But here is where it gets interesting for developers and users alike.

Once a user installs a Kynetx application, developers can update their applications without requiring manual updates on the users end. Basically, Kynetx applications work like web applications, but are based on the client. After talking to many developers at the conference, this is a god send in their eyes.

So there you have it. This is what Steve Fulling meant by #itsallaboutholdenpage. It simply means that anyone can shape the web to their liking using Kynetx, and developers can make these applications in ways that are convenient, simple, and respectful to users as well.

So, if you ever see the hashtag #itsallaboutholdenpage, replace my name with yours. I want you to do this, because with Kynetx, and the contextual web, it’s not about me, Facebook, Google, or Twitter.

#itsallaboutyou.

Share
Posted in Tech | Tagged , | 6 Comments

Expect an HP Tablet Not Based On Windows Any Day Now (Think WebOS)

BAM!

HP has bought Palm for $1.2 billion dollars.

Wow.

Now that HP has such a valuable company in their hands, and a beautiful OS, what do they plan to do with it?

Yesterday I had the opportunity to extensively play with Steven Nay’s Palm Pre (the only person at the Kynetx Impact Conference to have one) and the device, as well as the OS, is beautiful. Due to being surrounded by people with iPad’s, I thought about how awesome it would be to have Palm’s unique WebOS on a tablet/iPad like product with its beautiful multi-tasking.

I believe due to HP wanting to compete (and is, badly) in the tablet arena, a lack of an OS *designed* for touch, and the purchase of Palm with their amazing WebOS, we will be seeing some amazing tablets coming out of the gates of HP within the next year.

After all, WebOS is innovative, unique, and already has an app store (albeit a small one). With a tablet released on the WebOS platform and based on great HP hardware, I am willing to bet that the iPad will have a serious competitor. I am also going to go out on a limb here and say that die-hard iPad lovers would be willing to switch to the HP/WebOS based tablet. In its current form, WebOS, IMO, would be superior in a tablet form.

Now I know what you are thinking, “WHAT ABOUT THE APPS!”. If HP can make a tablet based off of WebOS a success, you can bet your bottom dollar that developers will have no problem developing applications on the WebOS platform.

Of course, I could be completely wrong, but I doubt it in this case. HP wants to compete in the tablet market, and Windows 7 is simply not good enough, but WebOS is.

What else does Palm really have to give HP?

NOTE: Mathew Ingram seems to think so as well :D


Share
Posted in Tech | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Are We Moving Towards The Triumvirate Web?

This is why I love commenter’s. Ed Borasky, left a really insightful comment (not to mention used an awesome Latin word I plan to use whenever I can) that could be a post on its own. Here is his comment:

There are quite a few important things that neither Facebook nor Google do really well. Twitter and Wikipedia are filling important gaps for Internet users. IMHO the web is “converging” on a “triumvirate” of search (Google and Bing), networking (Facebook and LinkedIn) and news-history (Twitter and Wikipedia).

Those are the six places I visit regularly, although Facebook is coming off the list, and I use Google as little as humanly possible. If I were Google, I’d buy (and index) LinkedIn. This could be an enormous cash cow for them – they could wipe Monster and Dice out, I think.

*bold added by me to add emphasis

This “triumvirate” web idea is fascinating to me, and in all actuality, makes perfect sense.

Let’s be honest here, Google sucks at being social, but is great at organizing, letting you find, as well as create (think Google Docs), information. Bing does this almost as well.

Facebook sucks at all of that except at being social. They are great at finding and encouraging connections with friends and family. Linkedin is great at connecting people with their coworkers, and even future coworkers.

Wikipedia and Twitter suck at all of that, but they are great at news-history. Once Twitter enables public search of all tweets, it will be amazing to see the reactions of people during certain times during certain events. Then we have Wikipedia to organize the story within hours of it happening with tons of sources to refer to.

It is my belief that none of these companies can possibly be great at all these things. Sure, they can be good and do the job for some people well enough, the majority are always going to go towards the best. Right now, these companies are the best within their respective categories (information, social, and news) and each hold an equal amount of immense power.

What do you think, are we moving towards the triumvirate web?

After reading Ed’s comment, I believe we are.



Share
Posted in Social, Tech | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Google Is Going To Lose This Social “War” Due To Perception

I love Google, with all my heart, but in my heart of hearts, I know they will lose the social war.

While there are many little reasons as to why Google is going to lose, the main one is perception.

Facebook and Twitter are perceived as social companies. People know that they are about making connections, whether they be private or public, and that is 99% of their focus.

What do people think of when they think of Google. I asked many of my high school peers (31, to be exact) and the basic consensus was that Google, “finds stuff”. When I asked my peers what do they think of when they think of Facebook, all of them said something along the lines of, “I talk to/connect with my friends”. Then I asked if they would move social networks if Google had a better social network than Facebook currently has. Only two said yes, the others?

“Google just finds stuff, so what is the point of that question?”.

Ouch.

Now, I am not stupid. I know that asking 31 people is a small, nearly worthless, sample size. But I do strongly believe that this is the perception amongst many people my age and younger. Hell, when people take pictures with me on my camera, I often times hear, “Facebook/Tag it”.

Google, if it wants to be perceived as a social company, has a lot of work  to do in the perception, as well as product offerings (sorry, Buzz is not even close to competing with Facebook), arena.

Of course, the perception of these companies goes both ways. Facebook isn’t going to dominate “finding stuff” any time soon. Google owns that.

Share
Posted in Social, Tech | Tagged , , | 19 Comments

Should I Quit?

I am sitting here writing this post, about four hours before my 9 hour shift, dreading the fact that most of my time is going to be spent straightening items and doing returns for most of the day, with the occasional elderly customer asking where the ironing boards are at.

To be honest, I hate it.

I sit there and wonder during many of my shifts what I could be doing. For example, if I didn’t work 25 hours this week stuck in a building, I would’ve had time to write on my blog. Or, I could have been working on my latest short-term job for Philip Hotchkiss, instead of only working in 2 hour stints because by the time I get off work I have to worry about school work.

I could also be spending my time finding jobs that pay just as good, or better, then what I am doing for Philip.

Instead, I am straightening items, and walking people to various products around the store for a good majority of my time.

So should I quit?

I want to, dearly, and the thought to do so has been eating at my brain. But, I have to keep in perspective my responsibilities, and one of those responsibilities is paying my various bills on time. Sure, if I quit today, I could quite easily pay my bills based off of the current work I am doing for Philip. The problem is, this work is short-term, and I have long term bills. I am not sure if I am confident enough to keep finding jobs to pay these bills, and with my current job, there is a sense of security that I can.

Also, if I quit my job, it is virtually a done deal. Most people around here are holding on to their jobs tight, and that means no one is hiring, and if someone is, you’re competing with at least 20+ people to get one position. Now, don’t get me wrong, I have been one of the twenty before, and I know I can be one of the twenty again. But damn people, can that take a toll on your mental health.

Still, at some point in time, I need to take that risk. Only people who take risks succeed.

Is now the right time to take that risk?

I’m not sure, and I will continue debating.

3 hours.

Share
Posted in Personal | 1 Comment
  • Sponsors